Overview
Normally, CI is used on Platform 2.0 applications such as CRM (Customer Relationship Management), database grids, ERP (Enterprise Resource Planning), enterprise messaging, and SAP workloads. On the other side of the fence, HCI (Hyper-Converged Infrastructure) is a decent fit for a platform such as a Platform 3.0 application needing flexibility and the capability to scale swiftly at the least possible cost per unit. Hyper-Converged Infrastructure is created in modules by means of rack-mounted servers.
The CI and HCI market were non-existent years ago. Now because of continuing technological advancement, demand for a new type of hardware has seen unprecedented growth in recent years. Now it often overcomes IT professionals with a lot of options. Today’s businesses also seek IT to possess fewer moving parts while still offering the same or even broadened resources to users. This has brought about a shift away from a one-to-one correlation between physical servers and storage to a several-to-one affiliation between virtual appliances and a single storage controller.
Convergence is the minimalizing or prepackaging of several
layers inside the data center, typically computing, networking, and storage
into a single unit. Choosing a system that fits in the right category is
essential for IT planners so that they can complement present IT investments
and meet the long-term objectives of the organization. One foremost impediment
is that virtualizing workloads elicits expanded storage capacity requirements,
which results in a huge volume of superfluous data. This conundrum further
results in heaps of pointless efforts, time, unnecessary work, and other inept
issues.
The Hyper-Converged Infrastructure (HCI)
The Hyper-Converged Infrastructure |
Hyper-Converged Infrastructure, or HCI, similarly known as Ultra-Converged Infrastructure and Hyper-Converged Infrastructure, is considered the future of data center designs. This is because HCI is a software-defined approach. This software approach, which controls and influences all the resources that are on the top of the hypervisor, allowed the emergence of new data center concepts to materialize. HCI infrastructures can be implemented and positioned on any type of hypervisor and on any fragment of hardware via virtual appliance translation technologies and APIs. Additionally, if a second location is operating a different hypervisor, convergence software can translate virtual appliances from one hypervisor to the other, any fundamental hardware preconditions simply need to be met.
When is the use of converged infrastructure and
hyper-converged infrastructure a better option? It depends on what IT workloads
are running, how much resiliency is required, and how is the guaranteed
performance versus agility and scalability.
The Converged Infrastructure (CI)
The Converged Infrastructure Evolution |
Hyper-Converged Infrastructure (HCI) Pros and Cons
A hyper-converged infrastructure (HCI) is another option.
One of the fastest growing solutions for an evolving next-generation data
center. Instead of integrating typically three distinct hardware-based data
center resource components - compute, storage, and networking – are virtualized
and collapsed into an industry-standard x86 server, meaning that the storage
software is running either alongside or is integrated into the hypervisor.
Since the resources are software-based and administered from a single admin
console, HCI can significantly increase efficiency, improve agility, and reduce
TCO across the data center minus any trade-offs on availability and
performance.
Hyper-converged architecture is marketed and implemented in nodes that house all components. Storage software will typically
aggregate storage from each node in the cluster. Thus, HCI provides several
benefits over converged architectures, specifically: HCI is often cheaper and
easy to deploy. When weighing the CI vs. HCI, HCI systems are uncomplicated and
easier to manage since storage, compute, and network administration is
integrated. Moreover, HCI is scaled easily. As a result, if adding compute or
storage performance is necessary, all IT professionals should do is just
install another node to add resources to the cluster.
Though HCI seems to be perfect in all aspects, there is a
downside to it, specifically: Hyper-converged architecture may be more
selective to hardware choices, and unlike a typical CI system, many HCI
systems oblige organizations to procure all the hardware and software
altogether and expect nodes in the cluster to be identical. This will result in
agility limitations of the system during a modernization or expansion. It is
also difficult to just scale one component of the HCI since a node comes with
supplementary compute, storage, and networking. It is at times hard to
guarantee accurate levels of performance to a particular application. This
complexity in guaranteeing service excellence emanates from the reality that HCI
is a “shared-everything” environment. The identical compute that drives the
hypervisor also powers up the application the hypervisor runs on, aside from
storage software services that can be exacting.
All told, HCI systems alter how storage is run
and managed. Hyper-converged infrastructure is tailored-fit for platforms such
as Platform 3.0 applications needing flexibility and the capability to scale
swiftly at the least possible cost per unit. It is built in modules by means of
a rack-mounted server.
Converged Infrastructure (CI) Pros and Cons
When considering the top advantages of CI, it is easy to
understand why many organizations are so resolute in adopting this technology.
But the most logical first step is to decide whether a converged or a
hyper-converged architecture will work best for your environment. CI prepackages
the three tiers but uses separate components that are normally from distinct
manufacturers. Typically, these products are pre-integrated and, in theory, all
that is left for IT administrators to do is plug them in and start
installing an application or start creating virtual machines. CI is made of individual
components that can be decoupled from the infrastructure and be used
discretely. Individual blocks can be snapped together.
Functionally, CI systems are like an environment in which
the components are bought separately. This approach has had two especially important advantages: A CI system always complements an existing architecture, after all,
it is made of alike, if not identical, components. These products can be more
granularly well-tuned given that each layer is still a distinct component. If
more storage capacity is necessary or more performance is required, an
administrator can just add it without upgrading CPU performance, as is
frequently required with HCI systems.
Moreover, given that all units are housed in a single box,
purchasing, deploying, and using CI architecture is unbelievably streamlined in
contrast to conventional, non-converged architectural environments. CI removes
silos of technology, procedures, and people. Such silos are principally why
data center management has regularly been tortuous and difficult, this
epitomizes a big step onward.
Also, there are many converged infrastructures that are not
prepackaged. These are reference architectures. Providers for reference
architecture typically give an installation guide that will make it simpler to
deploy. These systems afford greater agility in terms of blending and matching
hardware, but also reintroduce the complexity of installation. These providers
also must concur to deliver seamless technical support among the components
installed, which would diminish any debate among customers and vendors as to
who is at fault for any breakdown for the duration of the installation process.
The Hyper-converged infrastructure systems: Appliance vs. Software-only
HCI systems are software-defined at their core. HCI vendors
often stay focused on the development of storage software to be precisely
scalable within the hardware nodes and unlike long-established scale-out
storage approaches, runs as a VM within the hyper-converged cluster.
In marketing this software, vendors take two routes, namely,
the appliance approach and the software-only approach. In the appliance
approach, the entire system is bundled with hardware and software, delivered as
a single unit. This approach may just simply be an ingredient of expediency for
the customer and the vendor… streamlining support and simplifying deployment or
it may also be for convenience. This approach may require every node in the
cluster to be identical, thus, it only makes sense for them to deliver the
nodes. In the software-only approach, the vendor will provide the software and
allows the consumer to choose the server hardware of their choice. This
alternative offers the utmost agility in terms of hardware choice. It is also
typically the least pricey since organizations can leverage present hardware or
buy the latest hardware from priced sources. The disadvantage of a
software-only approach is that it requires more forthright preparation and a
lengthier implementation process.
In the end, HCI cannot replace CI, but let us IT to better
tier the IT architecture to their ever-changing application requirements. Most
often than not, IT processes will profit from a combination of these two
options that can change as exigencies of their customers see to.
_______________________________________________________________________________
- Converged vs. Hyper-Converged Infrastructure Solutions
- Converged Infrastructure vs Hyper-Converged Infrastructure
- Hyper-Converged Vs. Converged It Infrastructures